Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 05:10

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Here’s what Ozempic and Wegovy are really doing to your mouth - The Independent
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
'Rock Showman' uncovers sandstone stegosaur near Whitby - BBC
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Midlife Caffeine Intake Linked to Healthy Aging - Neuroscience News
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Do most men prefer curvy women or skinny women?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Scientists discover that dogs can alert humans to this quickly-spreading disease - Earth.com
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Apple issues urgent warning to all 1.8 billion iPhone users - ladbible.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What would be the lowest score with 9 strikes and no gutter balls?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Health officials warn of measles case from traveler at Dulles Airport - The Washington Post